See this Call For Abstracts: Harvard 2018 Conference - Disability, Law, and Bioethics for what looks like a very interesting conference being sponsored by Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology and Bioethics at Harvard Law School.
Email: spd@societyforphilosophyanddisability.org
Call for Abstracts – Beyond Disadvantage: Disability, Law and Bioethics
Facebook Group
Meet the Editors of the JPD: Dr. Teresa Blankmeyer Burke is a Professor of Philosophy and Bioethicist at Gallaudet University, the world’s only bilingual liberal arts college for deaf, hard of hearing, and hearing students. She is also a Board Member-At-Large of the Society for Philosophy and Disability and the new Chair of the American Philosophical Association Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion: www.apaonline.org/news/news.asp?id=580252&hhSearchTerms=%22Task+Force+on+Diversity+and+Inclusion%22 ![]()
![]()
She works in a field that she defines as deaf philosophy - the space where philosophy intersects with Deaf studies. Her other research interests include disability and interpreting ethics, especially signed language interpreting ethics. Her current academic projects include assessing what it is to do philosophy in a signing deaf environment, overseeing the Responsible Conduct in Research program at Gallaudet University, converting her dissertation into a book manuscript, and writing a memoir. ![]()
![]()
Check out her recent chapter, “We are all disabled, until we are not” (in “Defining the Boundaries of Disability”): www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780367855086-1oo/disabled-teresa-blankmeyer-burke
“Many of us who are disabled are not particularly likeable or popular in general or amid the abled. Ableism means that we–with our panic attacks, our trauma, our triggers, our nagging need for fat seating or wheelchair access, our crankiness at inaccessibility, again, our staying home–are seen as pains in the ass, not particularly cool or sexy or interesting. Ableism, again, insists on either the supercrip (able to keep up with abled-bodied club spaces, meetings, and jobs with little or no access needs) or the pathetic cripple."
Stop Talking About Accommodations and Start Talking About Access
blog.apaonline.org
“Many of us who are disabled are not particularly likeable or popular in general or amid the abled. Ableism means that we–with our panic attacks, our trauma, our triggers, our nagging need fo...
Call for Papers for the Journal of Philosophy of Disability (JPD): Please consider sending your work on questions of disability to the JPD, and feel free to share this CFP in whatever way seems appropriate.![]()
![]()
The JPD is a new peer-reviewed journal dedicated to questions regarding disability, broadly construed, and it is the first of its kind. Edited by Joel Michael Reynolds (Georgetown University) and Teresa Blankmeyer Burke (Gallaudet University), the journal will publish peer-reviewed articles, review essays, critical responses, and commentaries, as well as occasional topical clusters and symposia.![]()
![]()
The editors welcome scholarship from all philosophical perspectives, including analytic, continental, and pragmatist traditions, the history of philosophy, empirically informed philosophy, non-Western philosophy, and other traditions and fields that substantively engage research in philosophy of disability.![]()
![]()
The JPD will be published fully open-access by the Philosophy Documentation Center with assistance from Georgetown University. The JPD supports and is also supported by the Society for Philosophy and Disability. Please send your submissions to jphildisability@gmail.com. You can find the submission guidelines here: www.pdcnet.org/jpd/Submission-Guidelines![]()
![]()
Authors will include Eva Feder Kittay, Jürgen Habermas, Havi Carel, Leslie Francis, Kim Q. Hall, Andrea Pitts, Desiree Valentine, Joseph Stramondo, Joseph J. Fins, Kevin Timpe, Adam Cureton, David Wasserman, Melinda Hall, Chris Kaposy, Licia Carlson, and Christine Wieseler.
"Should cure be the ultimate aim of health care? Sometimes aiming at cure entails trying to fix disability rather than enabling disabled people to flourish. Sometimes it obscures the goal of healing. And sometimes aiming at cure entails failing to distinguish between disease and difference. In this webinar, disabled writers and educators Anand Prahlad, Ann Millett-Gallant, and Karen Nakamura discuss how the idea of cure has shaped their own lives and how we can think beyond cure."![]()
![]()
Watch "Questioning Cure: Disability, Identity, and Healing,"![]()
part 4 of The Hastings Center online event series, “The Art of Flourishing: Conversations on Disability” here...![]()
![]()
www.thehastingscenter.org/questioning-cure-disability-identity-and-healing/?utm_source=Master+Lis...
Questioning Cure: Disability, Identity, and Healing - The Hastings Center
www.thehastingscenter.org
Part 4 of our online event series, “The Art of Flourishing: Conversations on Disability.” Date: May 11, 2021Time: 3pm ESTASL and CART will be provided Should cure be the ultimate...
#Justice #Fairness #SelfRespect #SelfDevelopment - Adam Cureton explores the particular challenges faced by disabled students in developing & exercising these #virtues: buff.ly/3sUbK8H ![]()
American Philosophical Association Society for Philosophy and Disability Routledge Education University of Tennessee Department of Philosophy University of Tennessee College of Arts & Sciences
Font Resize
Contrast
